So who will it be this week? Newt? Mit? Herman?

First it was Michele. Then it was Mit. Then it was Rick in a big way. Then here came Herman out from left field. Then here came Mit again. Now it is Newt’s turn to flounder and contort the truth. If this ain’t “flip-flop” on the Republican bandwagon, I’ll gladly eat my Styrofoam convention hat.

All this indecisiveness is due to the Wishy-washiness of the Republican electorate. And I’m sure it won’t stop there. Once the Republicans decide Newt is a bit problematic, they will look back to former governor Mit. The only candidate with credibility. From that juncture, where the Republicans go on to is anyone’s guess.

So, the process will continue. Flip-flopping because some well-intended evangelicals just don’t want a Mormon as a Republican candidate. So is that worse than a two-face slanderer from Georgia who claims he isn’t a Washington insider when he really is. Former speaker of the house not a Washington insider? Give me a break.

Is being Mormon worse than being accused of sexual harassment? Is it worse than being a loopy goofball Texas Governor? Ladies and gentlemen of the Republican Party, what are you thinking?

Speaking as an outsider, I really suggest the Republicans look closer at former governor Huntsman and once again back at Romney. Both have good thoughtful ideas and seem to have broader appeal. Both seem to have quality educations.

However, Republicans don’t want anything well thought out. Plus Republicans don’t trust anyone with an Ivy League education. Once again, Republicans being the narrow-minded champions of one-issue candidates. Throw out the baby with the bath water. Think like us one hundred percent of the time or jump off our flip-flop bandwagon. Kind of stupid, huh? No real wonder I had change political parties.