Monday, August 27, 2012

There is good reason to stick with what you know. And avoid the unknown.

To say the Obama administration did not deliver the promises they made in 2008, therefore I will vote for the other party. Such primitive logic is ridiculous statement. It would be like saying this Chevrolet did not get the advertised mileage as promised, therefore I will go with the Nash Rambler the other company makes. Even though the Nash Rambler was the ugliest car ever made. Probably the worse car ever built. A decision resulting in flawed logic.

None the less, had President Obama completed all he had promised, the Republicans would be doubly hopping mad. How would the Republicans have responded to a Universal Health Care law? Or voting in two significant Job bills? Republicans would have been massively livid. Once again asking to repeal such a thing. But the only thing that got in the way of Obama’s plans were the…you guessed it. The Republicans in congress. But anyway, to claim President Obama didn’t produce is like the Republicans being accused of killing the goose that laid the golden eggs. How could he ever get anything done with a stop everything Obama does party motto. And this started from day one. Did you not see this from the get-go? Were you not reading the newspapers back then?

The only policy the Republicans had from January 2009 was to shut down the Obama administration. How could anyone get anything done? That’s why they call the Republican party the Party of NO! Road blockers and constipationist all of them.

But to run to the other party under these circumstances is utter madness. Irrational. Only reactionary and stupid.

I’ll take the Chevrolet any day. The Nash Rambler was just an excuse to sell something for money. The why the American Motors Car company went out of business. And, who was the head of AMC? George Romney. Daddy to Mit.

No comments:

Post a Comment

So, what's your take on this?